Rittenhouse shot Grosskreutz when Grosskreutz removed the gun from his clothes, pointed it at Rittenhouse’s head, and started moving towards the fallen Rittenhouse (as Grosskreutz himself admitted in his sworn testimony). Obviously, exercising a legal right to carry a gun is not the “textbook definition” of intent to murder.įurthermore, Rittenhouse was not carrying his gun in a “crowd of unarmed citizens.” He was carrying his gun in a mob of violent felons, rioters, and arsonists, some of whom were themselves armed with guns.įor example, Gaige Grosskreutz, one of the violent felons who attacked Rittenhouse and whom he shot, was armed with a loaded Glock, that he was carrying concealed in his clothes, in violation of Wisconsin law. That is why the gun charge was withdrawn and never allowed to be submitted to the jury. Rittenhouse had the legal right under Wisconsin law to carry the gun. LOL, what “textbook” are you morons reading? Because any textbook that says that is full of sh*t. That is the textbook definition of intention.” “Rittenhouse took the lives of innocent people with the intent to do so-by strapping an assault rifle to himself in a crowd of unarmed citizens. The decision made by the court is one of thousands of cases that have been influenced by biased judges, predominantly white juries, and mistakes inherent in a judicial system founded off of injustice to begin with,” the spokesperson said. That is the textbook definition of intention. The Students for Socialism chapter spokesperson contended that the Rittenhouse trial “effectively gives right-winged individuals the license to kill other individuals who protest for human rights.” “Our campus is already unsafe as is, and we would like to abate this danger as much as possible.” “The goal of these demands is to let the ASU administration know that we as the ASU community do not feel safe knowing that a mass shooter, who has expressed violent intentions about ‘protecting property’ over people, is so carelessly allowed to be admitted to the school at all,” the spokesperson said. The group’s spokesperson (yes, it has a spokesperson) spoke to Fox News:Ī Students for Socialism at Arizona State University spokesperson told Fox News that the ultimate goal of the demands is to let the university administration know that they do not feel safe knowing that a “mass shooter” is admitted to the school. How much would you bet these people have posters of Che and Marx on their walls? “Join us to demand from ASU that these demands be met to protect students from a violent, blood-thirsty murderer.” “Even with a not-guilty verdict from a ‘flawed’ justice system – Kyle Rittenhouse is still guilty to his victims and the families of those victims,” the groups concluded.

Students for Socialism ASU 🚩 November 26, 2021

Pclp arizona law